[go: up one dir, main page]

Blogs

Today’s MEN column: three to watch


8th February, 2010

logomen

Say what you want about Britain’s first-past-the-post electoral system, it does at least focus the attention.

Take our region, for example.

No matter how big a swing the Conservatives achieve, there are still only a handful of seats that are likely to change hands.

It is these ‘weathervane’ constituencies that will determine who forms the next government. And it is here that the parties will be concentrating both their efforts, and their limited funds.

Some have a particular significance. David Cameron speaks openly about the importance of Bolton and Bury to his party. Not only because they contain three marginal seats, but also because of the symbolic value of the Tories gaining a foothold in a Greater Manchester town.

Mr Cameron, who has invested a lot of effort winning hearts and minds in the urban north, wants a national mandate for change. He wants to be able to say he speaks for everyone. He needs the political map to show blue, as well as red and yellow, in places like ours.

But there are other constituencies in Greater Manchester which will have special significance this time, for all sorts of reasons.

Can the Liberal Democrats defend Cheadle against the Tories, and Withington and Rochdale against Labour? They will need to if Nick Clegg is to credibly claim his party is moving forward rather than stagnating. And will the anger over ‘expensesgate’ lead to seismic shifts in paces like Salford, or will it prove to be a storm in a (taxpayer-funded, bone-china) teacup?

Here, then, is my list of the top three constituencies to watch at the general election next year.

Bolton West – 2005: Ruth Kelly (Lab), Majority 2,064

A Labour seat since the Blair revolution of 1997 and held by the arch-Blairite, high-achieving Ms Kelly. It was not always thus; the seat was in Conservative hands between 1983-1997. In the 1950s it was a Liberal stronghold.

Ms Kelly is standing down this year. The Labour candidate will be Julie Hilling, a local activist who has lived in the constituency for two decades and rose through a trade union background.

Her Tory opponent is Susan Williams, the well-known former leader of Trafford council. Ms Williams, one of the faces of the successful ‘no’ campaign during the congestion-charge referendum, is in many ways Mr Cameron’s ideal ‘northern’ candidate: straight-talking, pragmatic and moderate. But she is also a skilled politician, who opponents underestimate at their peril.

The Liberal Democrats are also standing a woman candidate – Jackie Pearcey, a widely-respected councillor in Manchester who will run a strong campaign. Expect the Tories to pour resources into the constituency, with ‘big beasts’ from the shadow cabinet likely to be stalking the streets in the weeks and months to come. It’s one they will feel they will have to win to have any chance of forming the next government.

2005 result: Lab 17,239, Con 15,175, LD 7,241

Current odds: Con 2/7, Lab 5/2, LD 50/1

Bury North – 2005: David Chaytor (Lab), Majority: 2,926
How can the Tories be almost-unbackable favourites to win a seat they lost last time by nearly 3,000 votes? The answer, in one word: expenses.

David Chaytor, the current MP, learned last week he was to face three charges in relation to his parliamentary claims. He strongly denies claims of deliberate wrongdoing, but the allegations will inevitably cast a shadow over the next election.

Bury North is another seat lost to the Conservatives in 1997. Before that, it was held for many years by Alistair Burt, an Oxford-educated solicitor and former Bury Grammar head boy who has since returned to the Commons as a Tory MP in Bedfordshire. The Liberal Democrats have traditionally come a fairly distant third.

Labour have chosen their candidate well. Maryam Khan, daughter of former Manchester Lord Mayor Afzal Khan, represents a clean break from the past. She is bright, young, photogenic and down-to-earth. But she is not a miracle-worker.

David Nuttall, the Conservative candidate, left school at 18 before joining a firm of solicitors and getting a law degree in his spare time. He is active in his community and church and is a traditionalist making clear on his website that he would support capital punishment for murder, and reducing the time limit for abortions from 24 to 20 weeks.

The Lib Dems Richard Baum is an energetic young councillor and blogger who is tipped for big things in the future.

2005 result: Lab 19,130, Con 16,204, LD 6,514

Current odds: Con 1/6, Lab 7/2, LD 100/1

Manchester Withington – 2005: John Leech (LD), Majority: 667

My abiding memory of the 2005 election? A stunned John Leech taking to the stage at Manchester town hall, barely able to recite the victory speech he had barely bothered to write. It was an incredible win, overturning an 11,000-plus Labour majority and ending the Commons career of the respected Keith Bradley.

But the campaign was also a byword for bitterness. Labour activists still claim that the Lib Dems exaggerated fears, first expressed by doctors, over the future of services at the Christie hospital. The Lib Dems responded that they were simply campaigning to protect a world-famous resource.

What’s beyond doubt is that Mr Leech has proved an extremely active MP, winning awards for campaigns on road safety and championing several high-profile local causes. In response Labour has rolled out one of its brightest young things, Lucy Powell, who was appointed director of the pro-European Britain in Europe campaign while still in her 20s. Withington, though, could yet prove a campaign too far.

And the Conservatives? They were a distant third in 2005. Yet until Mr Bradley was elected in 1987, Withington had been a Tory stronghold since before the Second World War. How times have changed for the Conservatives and how they hope they are about to change again.

2005: LD 15,872, Lab 15,205, Con 3,919
Current odds: LD 2/5, Lab 7/4, Con 80/1

Add A Comment




Showing 4 comments for “Today’s MEN column: three to watch”


Exactly.

Neither the Tories nor Labour have to bother about trying to appeal to people in the other 90% of the seats in the UK, they already know which way they will vote.

In my opinion the totally unfair electoral system is the primary reason for the huge divide we see in our society.

Why should either the Labour Party or Tories want to appeal to the people of Gorton, Wythenshawe, Moston… there is no point in creating policies for these people, especially if they may slightly upset those in the marginal constituencies.

The main parties will always direct there policies at the swing voters in these areas to the detriment of the rest of the population every election until we change to a fairer voting system. Until such a time the divide we have wil only get bigger as there is no incentive whatsoever for either party to do anything about the divide, in fact the current system actively discourages any improvement in the system as the policies that may well help close the divide will often be repulsive to those swing voters in the marginals.

Fix the electoral system and you’ll fix an awful lot in the UK.

I’m not 100% au fait with our campaigns in Gorton or Moston but I know that our candidate in Wythenshawe, Janet Clowes, is working extremely hard on behalf of local residents. Indeed a few weeks ago I accompanied her on a tour of Manchester Airport which is of course the key employer in that constituency as well as a major contributor to the regional economy.

Individually maybe, but issues such as the inheritance tax show exactly where the Tories priorities lie and it is not with the people of Wythenshawe.

If the Tories really cared about the poor why not spend the money earmarked for the mega-rich at the poor in society? Why not use that money to raise the point at which you start paying tax – something that proportioanlly helps the poorer more than the rich.

Likewise, if Labour were not able to take their core vote for granted, as the current system blocks alternative parties from gaining a foothold, then we would not have had the disgraceful 10% tax band scrappage, a policy that still today is making the poorer worse off then before.
Back to Wythenshawe, very belated where it is due, but we are finally going to see Metrolink in the area, a scheme that is much needed to help re-generate the area. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the Tories would back this scheme. Voting Tory in Wythenshawe, if you want the Metrolink scheme to be delivered is turkey at Christmas time.

Another web site, that talks about political betting has an article about the ‘marginals’ and how they tend to be small English towns, towns the size of Luton and Swindon, right across the country.

This leads to the main parties to have policies massively overly aimed at those societies. Areas with more married with two children, two car households, semi-detached houses.

The rubbish electoral system gives these people in these areas much more influence over the government policy.

Look at the drive by parties to covert favour from the ‘hard working family’ and ‘Mondeo man’. With this system it will always be more important to keep the price of petrol down than to improve the public transport in the major northern cities for example.

David Ottewell

David Ottewell

David Ottewell is chief reporter of the Manchester Evening News and specialises in writing about politics.

Follow me on Twitter